It is requested that a map or maps be included in this article to improve its quality. Wikipedians in the United States may be able to help!
A fact from Old Connecticut Path appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 4 September 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Connecticut, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Connecticut on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConnecticutWikipedia:WikiProject ConnecticutTemplate:WikiProject ConnecticutConnecticut
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of the United States on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject United States HistoryTemplate:WikiProject United States HistoryUnited States History
Latest comment: 10 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion
Are any parts of the Old Connecticut Path commemorated with historical markers or designated as historical sites by the states involved or the US? Thank you, Wordreader (talk) 01:49, 11 August 2013 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for your reply, Garchy. My 16th & 17th century ancestors followed the frontier through the wild lands of Connecticut, most probably along Native trails, so the whole early European migration through New England fascinates me. That the Native North Americans had such an intricate web of trailways, with altered trees acting as sign posts, no less, is even more fascinating. Yours, 24.47.173.120 (talk) 17:28, 12 December 2014 (UTC)Reply
