Talk:Ohio State Route 364

Ohio State Route 364 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
December 16, 2013	Good article nominee	Not listed
April 3, 2017	Good article nominee	Listed

Current status: Good article

United States: Ohio Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ohio portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ohio (assessed as Low-importance).

U.S. Roads: State highways / Ohio Mid‑importance

	U.S. roads portal This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Topics	U.S. state highways
Locations	Ohio
	This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.
	This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists.
	This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

GA Review

Latest comment: 7 years ago16 comments2 people in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:Ohio State Route 364/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Cameron11598 (talk · contribs) 19:25, 3 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Claiming, will review later. --Cameron₁₁₅₉₈ ^(Talk) 19:25, 3 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	"and became completely paved by 1940." - that part of the sentence is grammatically incorrect. "In Auglaize County, a gravel road from SR 219 to SR 32 was built by 1932," - this could probably be phrased better
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.	no problems here --Cameron₁₁₅₉₈ ^(Talk) 19:51, 3 April 2017 (UTC)Reply
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.	Article is well sourced. --Cameron₁₁₅₉₈ ^(Talk) 19:53, 3 April 2017 (UTC)Reply
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).	no issues that I can see --Cameron₁₁₅₉₈ ^(Talk) 19:52, 3 April 2017 (UTC)Reply
	2c. it contains no original research.	No Original Research --Cameron₁₁₅₉₈ ^(Talk) 19:50, 3 April 2017 (UTC)Reply
	2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.	No Copy Right Violations detected --Cameron₁₁₅₉₈ ^(Talk) 19:29, 3 April 2017 (UTC)Reply
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.	No issues here --Cameron₁₁₅₉₈ ^(Talk) 19:55, 3 April 2017 (UTC)Reply
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).	No issues here --Cameron₁₁₅₉₈ ^(Talk) 19:55, 3 April 2017 (UTC)Reply
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.	Written with a WP:NPOV --Cameron₁₁₅₉₈ ^(Talk) 19:55, 3 April 2017 (UTC)Reply
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.	No edit wars, seems stable --Cameron₁₁₅₉₈ ^(Talk) 19:55, 3 April 2017 (UTC)Reply
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	image has correct license info. --Cameron₁₁₅₉₈ ^(Talk) 19:36, 3 April 2017 (UTC)Reply
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	the image's caption could use some expanding. As it is the caption doesn't provide any context on why the image is relevant to the article. For reference I'm revering to "Grand Lake St. Marys State Park"--Cameron₁₁₅₉₈ ^(Talk) 19:37, 3 April 2017 (UTC)Reply
	7. Overall assessment.	all issues have been fixed so I'm going to pass this. --Cameron₁₁₅₉₈ ^(Talk) 20:28, 3 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

@CycloneIsaac: Only a few minor things to fix. Good work! --Cameron₁₁₅₉₈ ^(Talk) 20:01, 3 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

@Cameron11598: All issues fixed.—CycloneIsaac (Talk) 20:27, 3 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic