Talk:Ohio State Route 167

Ohio State Route 167 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: January 14, 2014. (Reviewed version).

United States: Ohio Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ohio portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ohio.

U.S. Roads: State highways / Ohio Mid‑importance

	U.S. roads portal This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Topics	U.S. state highways
Locations	Ohio
	This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.
	This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists.
	This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

GA Review

Latest comment: 10 years ago12 comments2 people in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:Ohio State Route 167/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Newyorkadam (talk · contribs) 19:07, 12 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

I'll take this. I'll start it tomorrow.

Quick-glance comments:

SR 538, which is wikilinked in this article, just redirects back to Ohio State Route 167 (the article nominated for GA)
I know a photo of the route isn't required, but it certainly can't hurt. Can you please try to find one?
Y No disambiguation links in this article
Other than that it looks good :) I'll start this either later today or tomorrow!

-Newyorkadam (talk) 21:19, 13 January 2014 (UTC)NewyorkadamReply

Done.—CycloneIsaac–E-Mail 23:41, 13 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Comments:

Please wikilink 'US 6', 'at-grade intersection'
Done.—CycloneIsaac–E-Mail 21:15, 14 January 2014 (UTC)Reply
Please add a reference after this line, because it's statistical data: 'The highest traffic count is in Jefferson, where 2,260 vehicles travel on the road on average.'
Eh, added.—CycloneIsaac–E-Mail 21:15, 14 January 2014 (UTC)Reply
Please try to find some more references for the 'Route description' section. There aren't any references for where the route is located.
Map and coordinates aren't enough?—CycloneIsaac–E-Mail 21:15, 14 January 2014 (UTC)Reply
Please remove the comma in this line: 'SR 167 was designated in 1923, as a short connector from SR 7 to the Pennsylvania state line east of Richmond Center.'
Done.—CycloneIsaac–E-Mail 21:15, 14 January 2014 (UTC)Reply
In this line, what is Richmond Center? Is there an article about it (if so, please wikilink it). Please describe what it is. 'SR 167 was designated in 1923, as a short connector from SR 7 to the Pennsylvania state line east of Richmond Center.'
No link, but mentioned what it is.—CycloneIsaac–E-Mail 21:15, 14 January 2014 (UTC)Reply
Please change 'Around 1969' to 'In about 1969' or something similar, to me it sounds moar correct.
Done.—CycloneIsaac–E-Mail 21:15, 14 January 2014 (UTC)Reply
In the 'Major intersections' section, you have a note for every destination except for SR 93. Could you please add a note :)?
No. It's optional.—CycloneIsaac–E-Mail 21:15, 14 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Everything else looks good! I'll do the table once you go over my comments :) -Newyorkadam (talk) 20:28, 14 January 2014 (UTC)NewyorkadamReply

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	After edits, yes :)
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
	2c. it contains no original research.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.	Only recent edits are by User:CycloneIsaac (the nominator). No edit wars.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	The Ohio State Route sign is in the public domain, the map is user-made, and the picture of the route is from Flickr, under the license 'Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 Generic' which is allowed on WIkipedia!
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
	7. Overall assessment.	Congrats :D

Final decision comment:

Passed! Nice article :) Looking forward to reviewing many more! -Newyorkadam (talk) 23:10, 14 January 2014 (UTC)NewyorkadamReply

Add topic