Talk:Office of Science and Technology Policy

Science Low‑importance

	Science portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject ScienceTemplate:WikiProject Sciencescience
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Technology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology

United States: District of Columbia / Government Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Washington, D.C. portal This article is supported by WikiProject District of Columbia (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Mid-importance).

Science Policy Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Policy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science policy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science PolicyWikipedia:WikiProject Science PolicyTemplate:WikiProject Science PolicyScience Policy
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

First Sentence

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The first sentence doesnt make sense. "1976 with a broad mandate to advise the President and others within the [?] on the effects of " Others within the what? I expect it should read " others within congress" or something similar, however, i am not sure exactly who it is advising so do not want to change untill this is confirmed. Any Suggestions? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.33.101.32 (talk) 16:09, 15 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

NASA Watch

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Interesting discussion about the use of the OSTP logo 83.163.5.82 05:30, 13 April 2011 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.163.5.82 (talk) Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Office of Science and Technology Policy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20121214022141/http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/floor_activity/08_02_2012_Senate_Floor.htm to http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/floor_activity/08_02_2012_Senate_Floor.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 12:43, 15 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

blockchain and cryptocurrency specialist advisory position as established by PL 117-167 Sec. 10671

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

When should we add the new advisor position to the page? The bill doesn't specify an enactment date other then the director of the OSTP has to establish or appoint someone to the position. Do we wait till then or just add a vacancy? DanielgClifft (talk) 02:44, 6 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic