| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
members
editnow can someone fix the members section. looks sloppy.99.230.65.158 (talk) 06:19, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
reformed
editthe interview done with anders was actually in 2009 but wasn't released until 2010 so that means the band reformed in 2009.99.230.65.158 (talk) 06:19, 26 March 2010 (UTC)<>/s>
discography
editI think the setup is wrong because I believe it shouldn't be separate but all in chronological order and the labels don't need to be there, it is listed once you've entered the separate links towards the articles.October 010 (talk) 05:45, 11 March 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by October 010 (talk • contribs)
- I've seen both ways done on various articles, and I don't see a good reason to change it from the current format here. If you have a policy/WikiProject-based reason to change it, please explain and provide a link. As for the labels, I agree, they show up in the individual album articles. My guess is that those were added prior to the album articles being created. They can be removed. MrMoustacheMM (talk) 09:53, 14 March 2012 (UTC)