Talk:Observable universe
Latest comment: 2 months ago by Octaazacubane in topic Shouldn't Universe be Capitalized?
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Observable universe article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
This article has a /workpage |
This level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The contents of the Large-scale structure of the cosmos page were merged into Observable universe. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Shape
editHow can we say that the observable universe is ball-shaped if we can't tell exactly what shape is the Universe? 79.186.242.134 (talk) 12:29, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- If you point your finger in the sky, look up and focus on your finger nail, then start moving your head slowly and stare straight, eventually, your vision forms a ball⚽ 120.16.2.76 (talk) 10:17, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
Shouldn't Universe be Capitalized?
editIf astronomical bodies are capitalized, and the monotheistic God is capitalized, something that could be described as both should also be capitalized, right? Octaazacubane (talk) 14:56, 20 September 2024 (UTC)