Talk:Oats Street railway station

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Oats Street railway station/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: APK (talk · contribs) 10:02, 10 December 2023 (UTC)

I'll be reviewing this article. I hope to learn a lot about the subject! APK hi :-) (talk) 10:02, 10 December 2023 (UTC)

Infobox...

• Can you locate updated ridership since 2013-2014? I see a 2019 figure mentioned in the article.
  • Added 2019 data to the infobox. There is no routine release of this sort of data so I have to make do with whatever ad hoc figures come out.

Lede...

• "the introduction of diesel railcars made closer together stations possible" =====> "the introduction of diesel railcards made it possible for stations to be built in close proximity to each other" or something along those lines
  • How do you like the way I've reworded it?

• Mention a bit of the content from the Description and Level Crossing Removal Project sections.
  • Done, although I don't want to make the lead too long for such an article.

Description...

• "Oats Street station is on the boundary" =====> "Oats Street suburban railway station is on the boundary"
  • I don't think this would be better. I try and use as few words as possible, and the extra words here don't really help I think.

• "which are suburbs of Perth, Western Australia"
  • Done, although didn't link Western Australia because MOS:GEOLINK and MOS:SEAOFBLUE.

• link "level crossings"
  • Done, good idea.

History...

• link Railways in Perth to "Perth's rail network"
  • Done, good idea.

• Is Stokely a discontinued station?
  • Yes. It was closed in 1989 and does not have a Wikipedia article. A short sentence on it is at List of closed railway stations in Perth.

• Armadale should be linked the first time it's mentioned in the body of the article
  • Done.

• link 2001 Western Australian state election to "new state government was elected"
  • Done.

Services...

• unlink Armadale and Thornlie
  • I think it is worthwhile linking these here since it is the start of a new section and MOS:DUPLINK was somewhat recently changed to allow this.

External links...

• change the Commons inline to the standard Commons link
  • Done.

On my computer the third and fourth images (minus the infobox pic) are fully in the references section. To avoid clutter, can you pick 2 out of the 4 you want on the page? I'm also not opposed to a gallery since the pictures do help the reader understand the layout of the station.

• How is that now? There are two images on the left and the infobox and one other image on the right. I'm not sure how that looks on your screen but I hope it looks fine now.

Thank you for writing the article! Let me know if you have any questions. Cheers! APK hi :-) (talk) 10:53, 10 December 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for the review APK! I've replied to all your comments. Steelkamp (talk) 04:38, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

There'still one picture in the references section on my computer, but maybe it looks normal on most screens. Nice job on the article! APK hi :-) (talk) 05:29, 11 December 2023 (UTC)