Talk:OSF HealthCare
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
|
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on OSF Healthcare. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100315064819/http://www.osfhealthcare.org:80/history.html to http://www.osfhealthcare.org/history.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:17, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Requested move 8 October 2018
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Consensus to move per WP:COMMONNAME, therefore, moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 13:12, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
OSF Healthcare → OSF HealthCare – Company prefers capital 'C' as its common-use name - see near address in footer on company website. Legal name is OSF Healthcare System. COI: I am employed by OSF HealthCare. Nlorentz (talk) 15:08, 8 October 2018 (UTC) --Relisting. L293D (☎ • ✎) 18:14, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose per MOS:TMRULES and WP:TITLECAPS which specify that this should not be moved as proposed. — Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 15:04, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
- Comment per MOS:TMRULES, "Trademarks in "CamelCase" ... may be used where it reflects general usage." Per WP:NCCORP, "Whenever possible, common usage is preferred (such as ... DuPont for the E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company)." OSF HealthCare is a proper noun, which is not adequately covered by WP:TITLECAPS. Nlorentz (talk) 17:52, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
- In practice to deviate from sentence case is rare and requires a preponderance of sources supporting it. In this case there are limited independent sources, and they are quite split on their use of camelcase. — Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 20:22, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
- Can you clarify what you're looking for? If you're looking for independent sources referencing OSF HealthCare with camel case, check out [Forbes], [Becker's Hospital Review], and [U.S. News & World Report]. Nlorentz (talk) 19:42, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
- In practice to deviate from sentence case is rare and requires a preponderance of sources supporting it. In this case there are limited independent sources, and they are quite split on their use of camelcase. — Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 20:22, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
- Comment per MOS:TMRULES, "Trademarks in "CamelCase" ... may be used where it reflects general usage." Per WP:NCCORP, "Whenever possible, common usage is preferred (such as ... DuPont for the E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company)." OSF HealthCare is a proper noun, which is not adequately covered by WP:TITLECAPS. Nlorentz (talk) 17:52, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
- Strong Support per WP:COMMONNAME which is policy and trumps any ridiculous sentence case guidelines specified in a style guide (guidelines which arguably allow CamelCase in cases like this anyway). Fundamental to WP is the notion that we reflect reality, not twist it into something based on our own preferences. --В²C ☎ 21:25, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Possible copyright problem
editThis article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. 💵Money💵emoji💵Talk💸Help out at CCI! 16:20, 13 November 2019 (UTC)