- Anti-nuclear organizations make the claim phase-outs were on the rise while pro-nuclear organizations claim nuclear energy was booming. IMO, this is one of the most important issues that the article has to deal with. A good place for this is the introduction. Some (few) statistics are at (World Nuclear Power Statistics 2004 - [1]). An illustrative graph could be a good idea.
- The country section needs to be expanded. Especially the following countries (along with possible references):
- Asia:
- China [2] [3]
- India [4], [5]
- Iran [6]
- South Korea [7], Kazakhstan [8], Japan [9]
- Pakistan [10], [11],[12] (Section I History),(Compare also Khan Affair) [13]
- Europe:
- France [14] [15]
- Russia [16] [17] [18] [19]
- Great Britain [20] [21]
- Ukraine [22] [23]
- Norway, Denmark, Greece, Poland
- Czech Republic [24]
- Romania [25]
- Americas
- Africa
- The discussion section could be merged with nuclear energy and expanded, e.g. with An analysis of Bernard Cohen's figures.
- A further argument for a phase-out could be workstations. The German Minister Jürgen Trittin claims more new jobs had been created by renewable energy than could have been by nuclear energy.
- The references need to be put at the end.
- A section at the end needs to discuss future perspectives for phase-outs/nuclear energy. (e.g. [32]
- Four Corners, a Australian Broadcasting Corporation series, had a programme on contrasting debates about nuclear energy in Sweden and Australia. "Who's Afraid of Nuclear Power?".
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "Nuclear power phase-out/to do" page.
