Talk:Now, Voyager

Psychology Start‑class Low‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Film: British / American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm
	This article is supported by the British cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Library of Congress Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Library of Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Library of Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Library of CongressWikipedia:WikiProject Library of CongressTemplate:WikiProject Library of CongressLibrary of Congress
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Critical reception

Latest comment: 8 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

A review in a current publication is not 'critical reception.' That term should be reserved for only contemporary reviews. If it isn't, then you'd have to include every review and analysis written over half a century. I'm removing the two citations that are to current day media. MarkinBoston (talk) 00:21, 9 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Basic information missing. The article says: "Prouty's quirky demands for vibrant colors and flashbacks shot in black and white with subtitles were .... disregarded." Nevertheless, it does not explicitly state whether the film was shot in color or black and white. Such basic information should be routinely included in an encyclopaedia entry on a film. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.255.93.10 (talk) 16:48, 29 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

It was shot in black and white. The artistic use of tone and contrast, very effective in the hands of skilled cinematographers of that era, make this film quite visually beautiful. That visual quality not only advanced the mood, it was (and remains) one of the reasons for its popularity. It was also one of the aspects that caused those cigarette scenes to effectively romanticize smoking for several generations -- maybe not a good thing, but definitely something that was part of teenage lore in the 60s and 70s.Tesseract501 (talk) 02:04, 22 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Tennyson?

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

It's not a Tennyson's poem, it's a Walt Whitman's. As it is correctly said in this other article: http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Now,_Voyager_%28album%29. See here: http://www.gutenberg.org/files/1322/1322-h/1322-h.htm#link2H_4_0285 213.60.20.204 (talk) 19:40, 16 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Tina

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Suggestion: I'm thinking Tina (Jerry's daughter) should be added to the list of cast members referenced in the article. Though not dozens, she had as many scenes as some of the adult cast members noted. In addition, her character served as a primary tie between the two main characters. Her character also served to contrast the healthful relationship between adult and insecure child [Charlotte with Tina] versus the unhealthful [Charlotte's mother with Charlotte]. As such, should we add her to the list? Tesseract501 (talk) 02:25, 22 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Add topic