This article is within the scope of WikiProject Country music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to country music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Country musicWikipedia:WikiProject Country musicTemplate:WikiProject Country musicCountry music
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Miley Cyrus, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Miley Cyrus on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Miley CyrusWikipedia:WikiProject Miley CyrusTemplate:WikiProject Miley CyrusMiley Cyrus
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong
Latest comment: 5 years ago11 comments3 people in discussion
@Ss112: I reverted your edit. I believe Category:Country pop is appropriate because disco is a form of pop, so the sourced genre "country-pop" means the "country pop" category is appropriate, or in my opinion, close enough since there is not an exact equivalent. ---Another Believer(Talk)15:47, 26 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
@Another Believer: Nope, disagree. Disco is not pop, it is a dance genre. Get consensus here and don't continue reverting or I will inform an administrator, because this is not the first time you've thought it's a-okay to continue reverting and disregarding WP:BRD. Ss11216:28, 26 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
@Another Believer: Spare me your hypocrisy. Your entire attitude every time you've thought you can get away with reverting as many times on as many articles as you've done it on is the definition of condescension. Ss11216:32, 26 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
”Find a source to verify the info you want to add” is Wikipedia’s mantra. If it’s “not helpful”, it’s only because you should know better to begin with. You shouldn’t be told this. You should know better. Sergecross73msg me04:01, 1 January 2019 (UTC)Reply