Talk:Norman Fell

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Ragityman in topic Best known for

Comment

edit

"born to a Jewish family" is a racial stereotype. If the person is Jewish, just say it. ----me.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.187.180.63 (talkcontribs) .

1. Please do not remove text from an article without leaving a summary remark. 2. A person can be born to a Jewish family without being a praticing Jew him or herself. -- Dcflyer 03:08, 13 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Yes you can be born to a Jewish family without being a practicing Jew, but this is just perpetuating a racial stereotype. What is the motivatation for promoting this racial stereotype? Are you obsessed with this? How about adding "born to a Christian family" to other articles? I don't understand what you mean by leaving a summary remark. My rationale should be clear. ----me—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.187.180.63 (talkcontribs) .

Here is an idea, how about everyone who is born to a Jewish family should have a yellow star on their wiki page, would you like that, Dcflyer? You are perpetuating racism. ----me—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.187.180.63 (talkcontribs) .

Providing factual information in an encylcopedia is far from perpetuating a racial stereotype. Also, what racial stereotype is being perpetuated? By saying "racial stereotype" do you mean Anti-Semetism? Take a look a some other Wikipedia articles: List of Jewish Americans, List of Jewish American actors, and List of British Jews. Do you think these promote "racial stereotypes" as well? This article is already tagged with the category, Category:Jewish American actors. Finally, let me address your point about not having "born to a Christian family" on other articles. The subjects of biographies on the English Wikipedia are overwhelming from the U.S., Canada, the UK, and Australia. The majority of individuals from these countries are Christian. In the minority are Jews, Muslims, Buddhists, and others. Pointing this out is simply providing factual information to the reader and cannot be at all compared to attaching a Star of David or a Red Crescent to these articles. -- Dcflyer 21:49, 13 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

There are indeed racial stereotypes about Jewish families, just as there are stereotypes about Asian families and black families. Why don't you start adding "born to an Asian family" and "born to a black family" to articles, Dcflyer? Why is there an obsession with promoting a stereotype about Jewish families? There's nothing wrong with saying someone is Jewish, if they are Jewish. Just say it directly, don't promote the "Jewish family" stereotype. ----Signed, me.

Citation for the reference to Jewish parents: [1]. -- Dcflyer 05:00, 14 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

This citation does not provide biographical information about the parents. 67.187.180.63 05:04, 14 July 2006 (UTC)Reply


Wow. This "me" guy is a loudmouth. To find "racial" connotations in an article about Norman Fell. Born into a Jewish family. So what. Nothing anti-Semitic about it, I say. All it does is state the fact that hey, his parents were Jewish. Now if it read "born into a Kyke family" then it would be racist.216.125.11.206 17:06, 24 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

I'm with the person directly above. Yes, there are stereotypes about Jews, but this article does not address anything like that. It merely states that he was both into a Jewish family. If "me" can see a slur, "me" should point out what the stereotype is instead of just saying "It's a racial stereotype." I don't see what's so stereotypical about being "born to a Jewish family" - unless ALL actors are born to Jewish families or ONLY Jewish families have babies in Philadelphia, PA, or everyone named FELD is Jewish (which, unless you prove it, IS a stereotype).Esaons (talk) 16:08, 24 March 2008 (UTC)Reply


Fair use rationale for Image:Roper.jpg

edit
 

Image:Roper.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 10:45, 6 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Needs more references, in-line citations to be rated any higher. --Bookworm857158367 (talk) 21:45, 10 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Filmography

edit

1973, The Stone Killer: how can LT Les Daniels be the CAPT of Detectives, LAPD? He's either a LT or a CAPT, but he can't be both. imdb.com also shows him as "Lt Les Daniels, Capt of Detectives, LAPD", yet movies.nytimes.com lists him as "Detective" Daniels. Has anyone here actually seen the movie and can answer this?

Norman Fell in family guy

edit

In Family Guy episode (with nuclear catastrophe) Norman Fell was one of three "most important people of last milenium that already died" between Leonardo da Vinci and Joan d'Arc :P I think it should be mentioned in article ;) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.112.115.34 (talk) 10:22, 22 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

It's Gary Shandling's Show

edit

He also stared as himself in episode 5 of the 1st season of It's Gary Shandling's Show called 'The Graduate' that aired 8th of October 1986. It's not hugely important but it's not listed in the table of television work.Dettawalker (talk) 02:33, 13 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Best known for

edit

To say that someone is "best known for" a particular work or series is highly subjective at best, and in the case of many deceased performers of long career, it depends on the age of the observer and their proclivity for sitcoms, or whatever. Norman Fell was an established and well-known actor, both name and face, long before Tex and Thelma's little boy tripped his way to fame in HIS only notable role. To indicate otherwise is almost as inaccurate as it would be to say that Don Knots was "best known" for the same role. Such sentiments are appropriate to 'TV Guide' and 'People' magazine, but are opinion, at best, and not very encyclopedic, regardless of how many thousands of times they occur in the wiki-verse. Just sayin'. rags (talk) 05:46, 15 January 2019 (UTC)Reply