| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Noida article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | Pull-Paar, Noida was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 15 November 2011 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Noida. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
 | This  level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 Archives (Index) |
|
This page is archived by ClueBot III.
|
Noida
editNoida is called the greenest city in india 2401:4900:415A:A834:0:33:E735:C001 (talk) 09:53, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
- @2401:4900:415A:A834:0:33:E735:C001 please show a reference Crainsaw (talk) 13:47, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
- Due to lack of appropriate reference, I am removing said claim. JerryXLII42 (talk) 16:32, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:53, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
Climate in the wrong section
editthe climate subsection is mentioned under the Residential Sectors and Villages section instead of the Geography section. 2607:FEA8:A420:8410:F408:74F7:B72:6319 (talk) 09:14, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
The montage in the infobox
edit| Old version | Sportslovermax's version with corrected caption | VideshiBhaktNRI's version with corrected caption | Less images | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg)
Discussion
edit@Sportslovermax and VideshiBhaktNRI: You both recently changed the montage in the infobox, and @JRDkg: reverted Sportslovermax's version saying repetitive and redundant images...restore old infobox pictures
. I have put the three most recent versions above. Please could you explain which version you think is best, and why.-- Toddy1 (talk) 11:38, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- Note that c:File:Noida sector 62.jpg is a photograph uploaded to commons by VideshiBhaktNRI from the internet. So there is an appreciable chance that it will be deleted as a copyright violation.-- Toddy1 (talk) 11:47, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- The copyright image has been deleted, so we might as well go back to the old version of the montage.-- Toddy1 (talk) 14:36, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
I cannot help feeling that a version with less images in the second line looks better.-- Toddy1 (talk) 14:50, 24 August 2024 (UTC)