Talk:No Tomorrow (TV series)

Latest comment: 7 years ago by AnomieBOT in topic Orphaned references in No Tomorrow (TV series)

Orphaned references in No Tomorrow (TV series)

edit

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of No Tomorrow (TV series)'s orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "1.04":

  • From Emily Owens, M.D.: Bibel, Sara (November 14, 2012). "Tuesday Final Ratings: 'The Voice', 'Parenthood' & 'NCIS' Adjusted Up; 'Go On', 'Hart of Dixie', 'Happy Endings' & 'The Mindy Project' Adjusted Down". TV by the Numbers. Retrieved November 14, 2012.
  • From The Tomorrow People (U.S. TV series): Bibel, Sara (October 31, 2013). "Wednesday Final Ratings: 'Arrow' & 'The Middle' Adjusted Up; 'Super Fun Night' & 'CSI' Adjusted Down & FInal World Series Numbers". TV by the Numbers. Retrieved October 31, 2013.
  • From Legends of Tomorrow: Porter, Rick (February 12, 2016). "Thursday final ratings: 'Mom' adjusts up". TV by the Numbers. Retrieved February 12, 2016.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 05:57, 20 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Corrected the issue --Ecto~enwiki (talk) 09:09, 20 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned references in No Tomorrow (TV series)

edit

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of No Tomorrow (TV series)'s orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "1.11":

Reference named "1.12":

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 07:48, 12 January 2017 (UTC)Reply