Talk:No. 1 Initial Flying Training School RAAF/GA1

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld (talk · contribs) 15:25, 4 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Short but sweet. Understandable given how long it existed for. Nothing to complain about, but I would mention the 1954 trophy in the lede. I'll pass it anyway and leave it up to you Ian.

Tks mate, done that. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 05:51, 5 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:  
    B. MoS compliance:  
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:  
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    B. Focused:  
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  

Good job!♦ Dr. Blofeld 15:29, 4 January 2016 (UTC)Reply