This article is within the scope of WikiProject Shopping Centers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of enclosed shopping malls, outdoor shopping centers, and dead malls on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Shopping CentersWikipedia:WikiProject Shopping CentersTemplate:WikiProject Shopping CentersShopping center
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state)
Latest comment: 2 years ago6 comments2 people in discussion
If one sees an account suddenly created and then making lots of edits, only to articles about malls, removing negative details, one might think that that editor is being paid by the mall owners to pretty up the articles.
As long as the information about the past history of the mall is sourced and relevant, I don't see a reason to remove. Trivialities, maybe, could be removed, but not substantial facts. Brianyoumans (talk) 23:10, 22 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
Yeah, I had totally noticed that. This sort of thing can be fine if they make positive additions to the article, but taking out sourced info just because they don't like it is not. Brianyoumans (talk) 00:28, 23 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
Fully agreed. I put a level 2 content removal warning on their talk page some time ago, but they removed it.