This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MediaWikipedia:WikiProject MediaTemplate:WikiProject MediaMedia
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Newspapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Newspapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NewspapersWikipedia:WikiProject NewspapersTemplate:WikiProject NewspapersNewspapers
Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
I already noticed POV pushing in this article with an un-sourced claim that the newspaper the largest "circulation of any North American Jewish newspaper". The claim also cites a specific number of papers distributed each week. This shows that the article may have been edited by users close to the subject. We need to be careful and keep the article neutral - But be prepared for PR pushers.
Regarding the opinion on the Jewish week's editorial board we must also remember to attribute the opinion to it's author per Telling the difference between facts and opinions policy which states "Any source can be a reliable source for its own opinion" - therefore we need to retain the names of the individuals who voiced their opinions in the reliable sources (-Steven Pruzansky). The opinion that was brought also appears in Pruzansky's party's BLP article Caseeart (talk) 08:24, 9 March 2015 (UTC)Reply
Research resulted that the weekly distributions were falsely exaggerated (without sources) by previous editors (unless the numbers changed since their edits). Also there were un-sourced promotional claims that were not supported by the sources. Maybe the template could now be removed. Caseeart (talk) 07:29, 12 March 2015 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
There are a variety of sources that discuss the viewpoints of this newspaper and the groups of Jews it supports and the groups of Jews it is more often critical about. This should be noted in the article. I began adding viewpoints from qualified secondary sources. Caseeart (talk) 08:17, 9 March 2015 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I switched this number to 55,000, which is the number on their own page. I found an alternative number of 100,000 from the following secondary source:
Page 405 in: Gerhard O. W. Mueller (2012). The Criminology of Criminal Law. Transaction Publishers. ISBN9781412849647.
However, since the number presented by the newspaper itself is smaller, I find it more reliable in this case.
Mikael Häggström (talk) 13:20, 4 May 2016 (UTC)Reply