Untitled

edit

There was a notice for speedy deletion, and I am not sure of the reason. Several existing Wikipedia entries refer to this disability magazine, so it is worthy of an entry. It would be helpful if someone could identify the specific problems. There is no marketing language in this entry. There are facts that are not verifiable, I guess, but how do you cite sources for things like "the magazine temporarily ceased publication in 1993"? I was there, so I know, but does this require a published source? I have noticed magazine entries with blatant advertising language, such as ColorLines Magazine, and I have genuinely tried to present material objectively. Please tell me what exactly is wrong. Thanks. Nolimits25 (talk) 15:26, 24 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Also, why is it not OK to link when other entries already mention the magazine? If links are not permitted, please consider correcting the name to New Mobility magazine with the "magazine" lower cased in references (e.g., it is New Mobility Magazine in Christopher Voelker). Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nolimits25 (talkcontribs) 16:30, 24 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Change to New Mobility (conflict of interest)

edit


  • What I think should be changed: The current editor is Ian Ruder
  • Why it should be changed: Tim Gilmer retired in 2018
  • References supporting the possible change (format using the "cite" button): https://newmobility.com/meet-the-team/

Jeandobbs (talk) 20:14, 3 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Done Raladic (talk) 20:52, 3 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

References