Talk:Nellah Massey Bailey

Nellah Massey Bailey has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: March 24, 2021. (Reviewed version).

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Politics: American Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by American politics task force (assessed as Low-importance).

United States: Mississippi Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Mississippi portal This article is supported by WikiProject Mississippi (assessed as Low-importance).

Women's History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women in Red: #1day1woman (2021)

This article was created or improved during the #1day1woman initiative hosted by the Women in Red project in 2021. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red

A fact from Nellah Massey Bailey appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 23 April 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Nellah Massey Bailey became the first woman to be elected statewide in Mississippi in 1947, less than a year after the death of her husband Governor Thomas L. Bailey?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2021/April. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Nellah Massey Bailey.

Wikipedia

GA Review

Latest comment: 3 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

Passed. simongraham (talk) 08:23, 24 March 2021‎ (UTC)Reply

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Nellah Massey Bailey/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Simongraham (talk · contribs) 14:39, 16 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

This looks an interesting article. I will start a review shortly. simongraham (talk) 14:39, 16 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Review

The article is clearly written and covers an interesting topic. It is stable, 99.9% of authorship is one user, DanCherek. It is currently ranked a Start class article, but has been developed substantially since being assessed.

The six good article criteria:

It is reasonable well written
The prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.

It complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead, layout and word choice.
It is factually accurate and verifiable
It contains a references section, presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.

Although there is a heavy reliance on contemporary newspaper articles, all inline citations are from reliable sources.

It contains no original research.

It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism.
It is broad in its coverage
It addresses the main aspects of the topic.

It stays ffocused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail.
It has a neutral point of view
It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to different points of view.
It is stable
It does not change significantly from day to day because of any ongoing edit war or content dispute.
It is illustrated with appropriate images.
Images are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content.

Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.

Overall:

Congratulations. This article meets the criteria to be a Good Article.

-- simongraham (talk) 08:21, 24 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Simongraham: Thank you for the review! I appreciate it. DanCherek (talk) 12:38, 24 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Add topic