Talk:Nehrim: At Fate's Edge

December 2012

Even though I love this mod to death... how is it notable for Wikipedia? 98.198.85.83 (talk) 05:24, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

Because it passes our notability guideline's criteria by having significant coverage in several reliable, independent sources. —  HELLKNOWZ  ▎TALK 08:46, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

It's not (even though it is a good mod), but admins on Wikipedia are known to play favorites. 173.209.109.16 (talk) 16:52, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Nehrim: At Fate's Edge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20101218212819/http://www.pcpowerplay.com.au:80/article/1516/Nehrim:-At-Fates-Edge/ to http://www.pcpowerplay.com.au/article/1516/Nehrim:-At-Fates-Edge/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 19:38, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Nehrim: At Fate's Edge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100116130613/http://www.nehrim.de/faqEV.html to http://www.nehrim.de/faqEV.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100116141854/http://www.nehrim.de/teamEV.html to http://www.nehrim.de/teamEV.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:59, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

Steam Release

Per recent reversions on this page, the fact that this mod has received a Steam release has been repeatedly removed. This is a significant publication, and despite assertions that Steam does not count as a platform release this is simply not the approach taken on many other pages, e.g. Garry's Mod and Black Mesa (video game). If this mod meets the notability requirements to have its own page, there is no reason why this relevant information shouldn't be present on the page in some fashion. I will be reverting the most recent edit on the basis of similar precedents if no one objects. —Legoless (talk) 22:47, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

What's the importance of it being released on Steam? Have reliable secondary sources covered this? Only primary sources, the store page itself, have been presented so far. MOS:VG#Platforms covers this in the first bullet, requiring discussion in sources. Furthermore, even with reliable secondary sourcing, it should not be in the lead or infobox. -- ferret (talk) 23:15, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Plenty of secondary sources available: [1] [2] Where would you suggest mentioning it if not in the lead section? —Legoless (talk) 14:30, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

At the end of Development. Note that right now the article is combining "Development and Gameplay", but they should be separate sections per MOS:VG, with Gameplay covered first (If only to state that most of the gameplay follows Oblivion game play?). The "Development" section should cover how the mod game to be, it's original releases, then finally it's Steam release (Greenlit? Early Access? Etc) -- ferret (talk) 14:34, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

I've separated out the sections per MOS and restored the info with secondary citations. —Legoless (talk) 19:29, 14 July 2020 (UTC)