Talk:National Peasants' Party

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Dahn in topic On Their Political Position

Untitled

edit

This article links to Christian-Democratic National Peasants' Party, but that's currently just a link back to this article. -- Jmabel | Talk 23:21, Feb 4, 2005 (UTC)

Hundreds of thousands of its members were imprisoned ?!? This was technically impossible. Anonimu 11:19, 16 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Proposed merge

edit

Strongly oppose merge to National Peasant Christian-Democratic Party (Romania). While that recent (now renamed) party claimed this party as an ancestor, they are quite distinct parties from different eras, with no continuity to speak of through the Communist era. - Jmabel | Talk 22:38, 23 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Didn't Raţiu and Coposu provide some sort of continuity? If by 'continuity' you mean inside Romania, clearly there was none, but those two men were not unimportant in the inter-war party and key figures when it was restarted in the early 1990s. Biruitorul 01:44, 24 September 2006 (UTC)Reply
Yeah, there is some continuity (as I suppose there was for the National Liberals), but it really seems to me to be more useful to handle them in two separate articles. Among other things, it lets us disambiguate more clearly from other articles.
In general the handling of Romanian political parties has grown like Topsy. I'd be a lot more amenable to coming up with a scheme for the whole topic area than just doing this one merge. Have you had a look at List of political parties in Romania? Would you be open to changing this to a more general discussion, moving the discussion probably to the talk page of that article, and linking to the discussion from the Wikipedia:Romanian Wikipedians' notice board? - Jmabel | Talk 06:56, 26 September 2006 (UTC)Reply
Absolutely. I agree that the situation is not uniform enough at this point and that a unified, coordinated effort would be the most likely to achieve some sort of coherence. For the record, I also agree that the two PNŢ articles should be kept separate, perhaps with a section at the end of Article #1 and/or at the beginning of Article #2 describing what activity there was in the Romanian peasant movement, if not as a party then as an informal network of emigrés, between 1947 and 1990. Biruitorul 18:04, 26 September 2006 (UTC)Reply
Sounds good to me. I have way too much on my plate right now to spearhead anything (even after a deliberate attempt at catch-up, I'm over 48 hours behind on my watchlist), but if someone decides to start a reorganization of the Romanian parties material, I will participate, and on the pre-Communist era I probably have a pretty good a set of reference materials at my disposal that are not online, though presumably not what someone will have with access to a good Romanian university library. - Jmabel | Talk


what does victim mean? Anonimu 21:15, 14 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

It's a bit ambiguous. It can be anyone on the receiving end of harm. For example, the person against whom a crime is committed would be a "victim". It can, in some contexts, have a narrower meaning. Here, it seems to be used in a broad sense: presumably innocent people who received punishment at the hands of a government. - Jmabel | Talk 03:02, 18 October 2006 (UTC)Reply
Heh, that's very subjective. A collectivized rich land owner could see himself as a victim, while the communists and the people with little or no land would consider the confiscation a right thing Anonimu 12:30, 18 October 2006 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on National Peasants' Party. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:29, 14 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

On Their Political Position

edit

Please, I respectfully request, that more research and investigation should be done on the issue of the political party's political position.

184.22.216.151 (talk) 23:25, 23 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Thank you to whomever updated this article. I appreciate it. 49.228.57.224 (talk) 16:06, 15 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Most welcome. Dahn (talk) 11:56, 5 December 2020 (UTC)Reply