Talk:Nasuella olivacea
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Lettherebedarklight in topic Requested move 7 October 2022
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | On 7 October 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved to western mountain coati. The result of the discussion was not moved. |
Requested move 7 October 2022
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. (non-admin closure) lettherebedarklight, 晚安, おやすみ, ping me when replying 12:30, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
– Move from scientific name to common name, in alignment with how the other extant species in this family are placed, as well as WP:COMMONNAME. UtherSRG (talk) 16:13, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
- Note: WikiProject Mammals has been notified of this discussion. UtherSRG (talk) 16:13, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose: Two common names, "mountain coati" and "dwarf coati". Stick with binomial. YorkshireExpat (talk) 19:30, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
- While the scientific names get slightly more Ghits than the "X mountain coati", the mountain name gets significantly more than the dwarf name. - UtherSRG (talk) 21:48, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
- oppose per YorkshireExpat see also WP:FAUNA—blindlynx 21:03, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose the scientific names are more commonly used than the vernacular names. Plantdrew (talk) 15:30, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.