Talk:Myrmidon Books

Contested deletion

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because it has been created by an independent party with no connection to the publishing house, who is interested in documenting publishers of work which has been selected for inclusion in major UK book awards. Myrmidon currently has no space on Wikipedia, and the entry is not promotional.

A book by Myrmidon was selected for the Man Booker Prize shortlist, as per the references cited, and has authors who have won prizes such as the Becks Futures Award. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bmcollier (talk • contribs) 00:24, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

phrases such as Their catalogue spans a wide variety of fictional styles are promotional--Vigyani (talk) 00:25, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

How is that promotional rather than descriptive? I'm happy to remove it, but it's a description of their output. I don't believe this speedy delete applies: "Note: An article about a company or a product which describes its subject from a neutral point of view does not qualify for this criterion." — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bmcollier (talk • contribs) 00:33, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

How a wide variety be defined. and please sign your talk with ~~~~, this article may qualify for wikipedia but the decision about delete/keep will be taken by an admin. --Vigyani (talk) 01:36, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

Sorry, was that a question or a statement? "Wide Variety" means that they look as though they produce a lot of different sorts of books, rather than being a niche publisher. I can't think of a more succinct way of putting it.Bmcollier (talk) 10:19, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

Here it was a question, but what I actually meant what that these kinds of phrases can not be used. A better sentence will be Their catalogue include fictional styles, from high literature to comedic science fiction, e.g. Toby Frost's Space Captain Smith series. --Vigyani (talk) 10:28, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

Can you point me to the style guideline that says this? I'm happy to change it if it's necessary but the original statement is more eloquent. How about "Their catalogue comprises work in a relatively broad range of fictional styles, from high literature to comedic science fiction such as Toby Frost's Space Captain Smith series" ? --Bmcollier (talk) 11:56, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

WP:VAGUE can give you idea, what kind of words are not to be used. On another note is high literature is some particular type of literature or high is just to add importance ?--Vigyani (talk) 12:09, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

"High Literature" is a term widely used in English, related to High culture. See for instance http://www.goodreads.com/shelf/show/high-literature --Bmcollier (talk) 13:40, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

It may make sense for an admin from the United Kingdom to take a look at the page, as they'll understand the importance of, for instance, the Man Booker Prize --Bmcollier (talk) 16:43, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

The Man Booker prize is one of the most important prizes in literature, as a few moment's research would have established and Myrmidon has twice been cited, once in the long list and once in the short list. Winners include Salman Rushdie, AS Byatt, Ben Okri, Hilary Mantel, Ian McEwan, Iris Murdoch, Kazuo Ishiguro, Roddy Doyle, Thomas Keneally, Margaret Attwood Icundell (talk)

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Myrmidon Books. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://archive.is/20130505074703/http://www.theweek.co.uk/tags/myrmidon-books to http://www.theweek.co.uk/tags/myrmidon-books

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:04, 10 February 2018 (UTC)