Talk:Murder of Catherine Cesnik
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Invasive Spices in topic March 2023
While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editThe section on Catherine's murder does not have an encyclopedic tone. It could use better sources, especially as the page will likely become more popular once The Keepers is released.
Death Date
editWhy is the date of her murder listed as 3 Jan, when, from what I understand, it is most likley that she was murdered when she was taken in November?
EmilySarah99 (talk) 02:39, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
- It now says body_discovered 3 Jan which is correct. I suppose someone corrected it. Invasive Spices (talk) 21:27, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
March 2023
editHello @Plutonium27: In Special:Diff/1144393404 you removed cited text and its citation. Why? Invasive Spices (talk) 21:28, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
- The Huffpost citation did not appear to be scientifically WP:RS but instead someone's WP:OP. Huffpost has a reputation for featuring - if not advancing - fanciful fringe claims. A characterisation that it's founder actively promoted. That is why I removed it, along with a number of similarly-oriented Wikipedia:Manual of Style problems. Plutonium27 (talk) 17:49, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
- Huffpost isn't an open proxy. What part of MOS requires removing Huffpost citations and their text without an edit summary and without {{cn}}? — Invasive Spices (talk) 21:30, 23 May 2023 (UTC)