Talk:MultiNet

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Has this model been practical in any way?

Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

If so for what?

I added applications with citations i⋅am⋅amz3 (talk) 16:03, 19 March 2018 (UTC)Reply
Apparently, no MultiNet-based code nor data of or from MultiNet is publicly available, making it impossible to compare it to the state of the art. (According to [descriptions](http://extras.springer.com/2006/978-3-540-24461-5/bu-gesamt-pdf.pdf), it *is* roughly comparable to the [rebooted AMR framework](https://amr.isi.edu/), although possibly more consistent and principled.) However, with the current degree of inavailability, it simply *does not exist* as a scientific resource, whereas the existing tools are probably too specialized (or too much of a research prototype) to be of general interest. The question about practical relevance is thus still open. Chiarcos (talk) 13:00, 7 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Since MultiNet is also the name of a TCP/IP stack published by Process Software LLC, I think we need a disambiguation page for this word. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Neilrieck (talk • contribs) 12:12, 3 January 2013 (UTC)Reply