Talk:More Than Words Can Say

It's NOT a Pentagram

Of all the idiots to push the whole world of rock is Satanic, someobody out there keeps editing this page to reflect his or her belief there is a pentagram on Alias' debut album. It's obvious, if one takes the time to LOOK at the cover, it's a sheriff's badge, which likely is in reference to the band Sheriff -- which was the forerunner to Alias. To bolster this original research, this idiot continues on a "666" rampage that becasue "six o;clock in the morning" is referenced three times in the song - twice in one verse and once in another - that this is a Satanic reference. Stop it with the original research and opinion. Discuss it here before you make any more changes, capiche? It's getting ridiculous. 76.214.218.23 (talk) 02:11, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Pentagram(Again??)

Once again, I edit this article and request anyone who has a valid source to PROVE the sheriff's bage on the cover of Alias' album is meant to be a pentagram, and that saying "six o'clock in the morning" three times in the same song over 2 different verses is a reference to 666 to please cite to said source before changing this article again. Fair enough? 76.214.197.145 (talk) 05:51, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

Not sure what the author means to have "six o'clock in the morning" three times and a "pentagram" image on the album cover, but I'm thinking this is one of those pentacostal idiots with way too much time on their hands who likes to stir the pot and find Satanic "images" in pop culture.

Six o'clock in the mortning is a time. Deal with it.

The "pentagram" image is merely a sheriff's badge. If you knew anything about the subject you're reporting on for posterity, you'd know that the band Alias contained former members of a band called Sheriff. A little play on the past, so to speak.

You religious fanatics really amuse me. I believe in God, I consider myself a Christian and yet I loathe the likes of you. Get a life and stop preaching against people. Religion doesn't preach intolerance and hate. I edited the article to downplay the overt Satanic inference76.214.204.132 01:12, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:CanSAAAAYY.jpg

Image:CanSAAAAYY.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 18:39, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:CanSAAAAYY.jpg

Image:CanSAAAAYY.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:26, 12 February 2008 (UTC)