Talk:Mongol incursions in the Holy Roman Empire

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Medieval warfare task force (c. 500 – c. 1500)

"Estimated at about"

Latest comment: 6 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion

@Neils51: The word "about" clarifies the nature of the estimate. The cited source says "estimated that before the battle at Legnica there were about 8 000 fighting men". Yes, "estimated at 8,000 strong" is technically correct, but to my mind it suggests the greater exactitude of the study of modern warfare. So what is "the problem" with it? Srnec (talk) 19:59, 12 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi Srnec, the problem with it is that it is not accordant with WP:TERSE. Words such as about, around, approximately, roughly, are superfluous when ‘estimate’ is used. An 'estimate' implies that the actual quantity may be higher or lower than that given. The addition of ‘about’ adds nothing to the sentence meaning or comprehension and doesn’t change the logical concept. You will find on this page that constructs using 'estimated at' are addressed in one of the rulesets (search for ‘estimated’) configured for AutoWikiBrowser. Note that poor source grammar doesn’t have to be replicated in Wikipedia (unless quoted). Neils51 (talk) 11:26, 13 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic