Talk:Mines and Works Act

South Africa Mid‑importance

	South Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of South Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject South AfricaTemplate:WikiProject South AfricaSouth Africa articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Human rights Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

from VfD:

~~No clear content or context. If a sub-stub, it's a very bad one.~~ — Bill 21:01, 6 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Delete Should be a speedy - no meaningful content (which jurisdiction passed this law, when, etc...?) OK, revised version is meaningful. Jongarrettuk 21:07, 6 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Keep. I rewrote this to be a better stub. It merits further expansion, but I think it now is probably worth keeping, even if not improved. --Improv 22:54, 6 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Keep as stubbed by Improv. I added a {{stub}} tag and added it to the category "History of South Africa". (In the process of doing that, I noted that apartheid wasn't even categorized under "History of South Africa"...or, indeed, under any category at all. Like, um, kinda silly.) Bearcat 07:05, 7 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Keep as improved by Improv. — Bill 11:34, 7 Oct 2004 (UTC)

end moved discussion

Copyright problem removed

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.nelsonmandela.org/omalley/index.php/site/q/03lv01538/04lv01646/05lv01736.htm. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. htonl (talk) 21:15, 7 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

The cause of mines and works Act

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

105.245.122.198 (talk) 12:57, 9 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic