Talk:Michael Atiyah/GA1

Latest comment: 14 years ago by Jezhotwells in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 13:36, 14 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: one found and fixed.[1] Jezhotwells (talk) 13:39, 14 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Linkrot: five found, three fixed and two tagged.[2] Jezhotwells (talk) 13:46, 14 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Checking against GA criteria

edit
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
    Although somewhat dense in part the prose is "reasonably well written.
    The artcile complies sufficiently with the Manual of Style.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
    Two dead links in the External links section. I couldn't find them in the internet archive, I guess you could just remove them.
    All other references check out.
    I placed some citation needed tags on paragraphs which contain statements that need citing.  Not done
    I see that the dead links have been removed, but nothing has been done about the needed citations. This needs to be fixed, the deadline is 21 November. Jezhotwells (talk) 01:46, 20 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
    Broad and focussed.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
    Neutral
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
    Correctly tagged, licensed and captioned
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
    On hold for seven days for the issues above to be addressed.
    Well the citation needed tgs have not been addressed so I am failing this as seven days have elapsed. Jezhotwells (talk) 15:07, 21 November 2010 (UTC)Reply