Talk:Metropolitan Life Insurance Company Tower/GA1

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Vami IV (talk · contribs) 03:27, 8 May 2020 (UTC)Reply


Opening statement

edit

Hello, and come what may from this review, thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. During the review, I may make copyedits, which I will limit to spelling correction and minor changes to punctuation (removal of double spaces and such). I will only make substantive edits that change the flow and structure of the prose if I previously suggested and it is necessary. The Nominator(s) should understand that I am a grammar pedant, and I will nitpick in the interest of prose quality. For responding to my comments, please use  Done,  Fixed, plus Added,  Not done,  Doing..., or minus Removed, followed by any comment you'd like to make. I will be crossing out my comments as they are redressed, and only mine. A detailed, section-by-section review will follow. –♠Vami_IV†♠ 03:27, 8 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Architecture

edit
  • constructed in 1905–1909. [...] in 1953–1957. "In" doesn't work here since this is not an x>12 span of time.
  • many 19th-century early skyscrapers Unwieldy; I recommend removing "19th-century".
    •  Done
  • provided by Hedden Construction Company. the Hedden Construction Company
    •  Done
  • The bells were the highest [...] The bells are respectively Change this up.
    •  Done
  • from which a "magnificent" Delete the last word here.
    •  Done
  • they were split up into different social hierarchies, with immigrants in service jobs; women in seamstresses' and cleaners' jobs; and native-born workers of both genders in white-collar jobs. Replace the semicolons with commas.
    •  Done

History

edit
  • in 1903–1905 See above.
    •  Done
  • In 1982, Cross & Brown Company the Cross & Brown Company.
    •  Done

GA progress

edit

Article passes Copyvio scanner without issue. Images are all free and relevant, too. –♠Vami_IV†♠ 04:27, 8 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

@Vami IV: Thanks for the review. I have addressed all of these issues. epicgenius (talk) 14:25, 8 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.