Talk:Meprobamate

Latest comment: 8 days ago by Changewikiback in topic Synthesis section has nonstandard structures

Wrong chemical structure

edit

The chemical structure of meprobamate is missing 2 methyl groups: CH2OCONH2 should replace OCONH2

A new structure has now been uploaded. Based on image at The Comparative Toxicogenomics Database--Colin 19:57, 20 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

The Columbia Encyclopedia, Sixth Edition

edit

I've noticed that almost the whole of this text can be found in The Columbia Encyclopedia (Copyright 2001-05 Columbia University Press). Therefore I've completely revised the text and included more research. I've decided to remove it from the category of anticonvulsants since it isn't licensed as such. Indeed it is used with caution in epilepsy (see British National Formulary 50: "May induce seizures"). --Colin 23:41, 20 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

History

edit

Inconsistency:

I'm an idiot, pardon my entering this in the wrong place, but I didn't see how to do it right.

The article claims that the compound was synthesized in 1950, but that a court case had found that 1948, it had generated a multi-million dollar number in sales. Someone please move my comment to the correct place, but also reconcile this error. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.71.253.204 (talk) 07:11, 17 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

I have removed the Trivia section statement by an anonymous contributor from 69.121.68.125 on 4th December 2006 that meprobamate was the first drug used to treat high blood pressure. This is hardly credible for a drug introduced in the 1950s. Other antihypertensives available before it included reserpine (and herbal rauwolfia), the early thiazide diuretics such as chlorothiazide, the vasodilator hydralazine and the ganglion-blockers. NRPanikker (talk) 02:01, 29 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Bad redirect

edit

When trying to find the page for Qiviut I used the search term "quivet" which redirects to this page. I don't really know what to do but I don't think this is a good redirect, maybe it is? 2.222.197.209 (talk) 18:26, 16 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Meprobamate. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:01, 8 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Synthesis section has nonstandard structures

edit

The picture showing the synthesis pathway for this molecule is correct in a chemistry sense but I've never seen molecules in organic chemistry draw with right angles like that. It does give a swastika kind of look to the molecules. Consider changing to standard organic chemistry skeletal structures. Changewikiback (talk) 00:55, 15 December 2024 (UTC)Reply