Talk:Maxwell MRT station

Latest comment: 1 year ago by John M Wolfson in topic GA Review
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Maxwell MRT Station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:42, 6 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Move discussion in progress

edit

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Aljunied MRT Station which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 09:33, 7 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Maxwell MRT station/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: John M Wolfson (talk · contribs) 03:03, 4 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

I will be taking the chance to review this article. In exchange, I highly encourage you to review Damen station (CTA Blue Line) for GA when it's ready, which will be in about a week or so. Thanks! – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 03:03, 4 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Criteria:

  1. Well-written:  Pass No issues here. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 03:03, 4 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
  2. Verifiable/no OR:  Pass Sources look good, every paragraph is sourced. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 03:03, 4 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
  3. Broad: ? This seems pretty short, even given the brevity of the station's existence. What even is the Thomson line, and could you give a little more background on it and its contracts? – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 03:03, 4 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
  4. Neutral:  Pass Seems decent enough. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 03:03, 4 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
  5. Stable:  Pass I see no signs of edit-warring. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 03:03, 4 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
  6. Illustrated:  Pass Looks good to me. Don't forget the alt text if/when you take this to FAC. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 03:03, 4 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the review! Hmm, the LTA isn't really willing to share much information on the background of the TSL. Nothing much on how and why Maxwell is chosen or built. And also nothing on construction challenges. Our transport agency is really brief on such information.--ZKang123 (talk) 02:30, 5 January 2023 (UTC)Reply