This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
Maurice Newman is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The article seems to have the ambition of repeating every single piece of bullshit this guy ever said about climatology. I cut it down a bit, but he says the same things all the other market-fundamentalist gasbags say. That is not really information, and it is not Wikipedia's job to serve as his bullhorn. In the spirit of WP:FRINGE, it would be best to reduce the section to the bare minimum: the fact that he rejects the consensus and the one subject where scientists actually took notice of him: global cooling. Any objections? --Hob Gadling (talk) 19:28, 17 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
.svg){kind=logo}
