Talk:Mary Perkins

Notability

Re Notability and proposed deletion:

That this woman was made recently made a Dame in the UK (the female version of a knighthood) for her at several major charities alone should settle her inclusion in Wikipedia; that she is also one of the founders and continuing senior management of one of the UK's most successful companies makes her even more important. In fact, I can not imagine on what grounds this woman wouldn't be considered notable. She's sufficiently notable that when the ***Times*** managed to get an interview (linked to) with her it gave her five web pages - and that was before she was made a Dame. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Umptious (talk • contribs) 15:13, 18 November 2007‎

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mary Perkins. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130130115107/http://www.growingbusiness.co.uk/specsavers-dame-mary-perkins.html to http://www.growingbusiness.co.uk/specsavers-dame-mary-perkins.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110524030923/http://www.kidscape.org.uk/info/staffpatronlist.asp to http://www.kidscape.org.uk/info/staffpatronlist.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:23, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Szatmár Optika Mátészalka!!!

good day! I would like to ask you, as the owner of Satu Mare Optics, to visit Hungary and ask people how they are treated, the management there! It is necessary to work continuously, in 6 +2 shifts the exhaustion and fatigue are continuous here at the workplace in Mátészalka. I ask you as the owner to do this against the fact that I wrote to you I know you are caught kicking out of the job, but I accept. If that happens. But you, as a person and owner can only change you. Help make the workplace better and make people happy to work as they used to! 2001:4C4E:17CE:C300:7CF1:2C46:6889:BD74 (talk) 08:30, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

POV

Or something. I read the sentence "She has admitted donning disguises and visiting Specsavers stores, posing as a customer." and it seems odd. Why is this "admitting", since generally it is a good sign if senior management care about how retail shops actually operate. I know that "franchise" is a mechanism closely allied to exploitation (the owning company extracts the profits, the operator provides for the losses), but this is not obviously a reason for the wording. I can't read the Times article. Can anyone comment? Imaginatorium (talk) 09:24, 15 September 2023 (UTC)