Talk:Margaret Morganroth Gullette

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Too promotional

Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I have had this article on my "to do" list for eleven months—I was going to write it from scratch. I see that someone else has done so before me. The prose I see here is too promotional. The lead section is composed of breathlessly positive quotes rather than a summary of the article text. The article text includes some statements of opinion given in Wikipedia's voice, such as "We can scarcely understand the role of biology or practice the freedoms of re-narrating our lives until we are able to identify more elements of cultural imposition" and "The goal is anti-ageist." The biography discusses a notable woman but it is constructed in an unencyclopedic form. It should hew more closely to facts and dates rather than the overreliance on quotes. Binksternet (talk) 15:33, 22 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

You should do a total re-write and give this article some justice. This is a horribly written piece of fluff. It is written by somebody who has been in academia too long. The way it is referenced always says somebody in the Liberal arts wrote it. If it isn't rewritten, then most of it should be deleted and the article taken down to a stub. Bgwhite (talk) 06:06, 30 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Margaret Morganroth Gullette. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121229190850/http://www.takepart.com/thebestexoticmarigoldhotel/winners/september to http://www.takepart.com/thebestexoticmarigoldhotel/winners/september

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:59, 2 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic