Talk:Manitoba Eco-Network

Canada Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Organizations

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

I have made some major changes to the article. As I said in the summary of my changes, I work for the eco-network, so of course there is an internal bias. However, I've made a strong effort to stick to the facts, and in my humble opinion it is now less biased by pov than when I started, partially because of the citations I have made, partially because of my language, and partially because having more information in the article allows readers to form their own opinions more easily.

I'd have loved to put in any opposing positions, but there aren't any organizations that I can think of that directly oppose us, nor are there any controversies, so it is sort of centred from the perspective of an environmentalist. I don't know how to tie in an opposing view and make it relevant to an article on the eco-network, unless I could find some sort of article directly mentioning the organization and putting forth an article against them.

If anyone has any such information, please come forward and edit it into the article; it would improve it.

Likewise, I've been using Wikipedia for many years but have rarely edited anything, and I don't really know much about how things work here. If anyone thinks it's worthwhile to re-assess this article, go ahead. Also, I removed the tag at the top of the article that claimed that the tone 'may need to be revised'. I did so because I felt the tone was more factual and more professional after my edits, but since I don't really know the standards, I may have taken it away too soon. If that was the case, I apologize, feel free to repost it.

Sincerely, Mikhail Kolybaba (User:Mikhailkolybaba)

Overall, it is inappropriate for someone who works for the organization to be writing its Wikipedia article. Please see WP:COI. As for the article itself, it needs more information on what makes it a notable organization, and this information needs to be from reliable third-party, independent sources. Right now, this article is entirely sourced from the organization and its partners, which is unacceptable. It would still class it as a "Start class", because while there is much more information, it is not well organized, it is only half-cited and it requires outside sources to help booster its notability. Cheers, CP 22:08, 4 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Assessment

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I have assessed this article as a Start Class, as it contains more detail and organization than a Stub Class, and of low importance, as it is a highly specialized topic within Canada. Cheers, CP 17:50, 1 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 19 external links on Manitoba Eco-Network. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:28, 15 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic