Talk:Mamilla Mall

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Mamilla Mall/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: GGT (talk · contribs) 22:20, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

I have read the article and found the read truly enjoyable, congratulations on your beautiful work here! Regarding a few very minor concerns that I have, I will make a few bold changes to proceed with the review. --GGT (talk) 22:20, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

• Location, history and retail sections: All in compliance with WP:WIAGA.
• Exhibitions and events: Was concerned with the use of blogs here, but the same content is verified by other reliable sources, which I would say is enough alone.
• Attempted terror attack: In compliance with WP:WIAGA. I would suggest this section to be incorporated into the history section, but I can imagine the rationale with its separation, as the history section is more concerned with the development of the mall/its site.

--GGT (talk) 22:40, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. Has an appropriate reference section:

   B. Citations to reliable sources:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

This nomination has passed, congratulations! A very thorough, fine and interesting piece of work, with extensive illustration of the article. Thank you for the enjoyable read --GGT (talk) 22:45, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Thank you! Yoninah (talk) 17:33, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mamilla Mall. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140806035749/http://www.lcud.tau.ac.il/lexicon/sites/default/files/article/112/Safdie%20-%20Mamilla.pdf to http://www.lcud.tau.ac.il/lexicon/sites/default/files/article/112/Safdie%20-%20Mamilla.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140806035749/http://www.lcud.tau.ac.il/lexicon/sites/default/files/article/112/Safdie%20-%20Mamilla.pdf to http://www.lcud.tau.ac.il/lexicon/sites/default/files/article/112/Safdie%20-%20Mamilla.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:16, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

Page name

I object to the unilateral page move from Mamilla Mall to Mamilla Center per one source, the architect's page. No other source calls it Mamilla Center. I am seeking administrative action to restore the original page name and designation as Mamilla Mall. Pinging @Beyond My Ken:. Yoninah (talk) 11:56, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

@Beyond My Ken: please explain why you decided to move this page? I see no talk about it either here, would be appropriate, or on your talk page. All sources I see when I do an internet search refer to this as Mamilla Mall, which makes your page move not in accordance with WP:COMMON. — Maile (talk) 18:55, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

That's what the architect calls it, but if there are objections, I'll move it back. Beyond My Ken (talk) 20:06, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

 Done Beyond My Ken (talk) 20:08, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

THANKS!! — Maile (talk) 20:11, 17 July 2019 (UTC)