Talk:Malekith the Accursed

Comics: Marvel Low‑importance

	Comics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Marvel Comics work group.

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character

Image

While I think the picture provided is quite striking, it doesnt present the character in the usual garb and pose that you might identify the character by. I'm not necessarily suggesting that a picture from the Walt Simonson days where the Marvel Universe version of the character was created should be used, but something that displays the character in a more universal pose. (talk) 16:13, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Malekiths Aim

Latest comment: 9 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Discussion on Malekiths aim

I believe him to be a Ultilitarian Dissolutionist in the sense that he seems to be of the mind that Materiality is Dross and needs be disregarded, this view parallels with the view of the Arhat lineage.--Twominds (talk) 22:56, 25 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Remember how Thor said to Loki that he lacks Conviction, now remember Malekith in a dark world where he said that we should never have been, now register to yourself, Malekith didnt lack any F*cking conviction--Twominds (talk) 20:59, 1 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

I'm not necessarily disagreeing with you, but I don't think you can use the movie as a reference for the comicbook character as they are two separate things and sometimes diverge from each other. So that quote would apply only to the film version of the character. If you can find a reference within the comic that makes the argument, I think that would be a better source as to the conviction of the character. (talk) 16:21, 6 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Add topic