Talk:MS2 tagging

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): DrarSoaad. Peer reviewers: Ewells2013, Mbarnett2014, Albahrani Batool.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 00:22, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Untitled

I found this article does not have enough information about this technique, so I am going to update and add some concepts as the procedure and add some Pros & Cons for this technique. Here a list some bibliography that I'm going to use for this article: • Marchese, D., de Groot, N. S., Lorenzo Gotor, N., Livi, C. M., & Tartaglia, G. G. (2016). Advances in the characterization of RNA‐binding proteins. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: RNA, 7(6), 793-810. • Said, N., Rieder, R., Hurwitz, R., Deckert, J., Urlaub, H., & Vogel, J. (2009). In vivo expression and purification of aptamer-tagged small RNA regulators. Nucleic Acids Research, gkp719. • Webb, S. (2012). Live and In Color, How to track RNA in living cells. Retrieved from http://www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/31890/title/Live-and-In-Color/

peer review

First of all, I liked that the writer mentions the recent results of this technique,also she explains the caveat of the process. In addition, I found that all references are reliable sources. But I have some comments in the Advantages and disadvantages section. In this section, I only read about the cons of the technique. I suggest writing some points about the pros. In addition, there are some grammar mistakes such as One of the caveats. i hope that my comments help to improve the article.Albahrani Batool (talk) 22:47, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

The article was informative, and I appreciated that the ms2 procedure was explained. I would suggest that the advantages and disadvantages be separated into two different headings to better absorb the information. There are some grammar mistakes, and sentences that could be rearranged to make more sense. Ewells2013 (talk) 21:59, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Grammar and Clarity!

This article, although informative, lacks clarity due to some confusing phrases and grammar. 130.79.19.88 (talk) 15:22, 28 September 2023 (UTC)