Talk:M-20 (Michigan highway)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

I have started the review. Reviewer: Racepacket (talk) 02:41, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

---

very well done. I am putting on hold so that you can address the issues noted below. Again, you are the expert and editor, but I am just raising these points for your consideration.

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   • change "Previous to 1969, M-20 extended" to "Prior to 1969, M-20 extended..."
   • change " running concurrently along the freeway to" to " running concurrently along the US-131 freeway to"

   "US freeway" still confuses the reader

   • change "a system of highways importation to the nation's economy, " to "a system of highways that are important to the nation's economy,"
   • change "The business loop turns north by campus" to "The business loop turns north by the campus"
   • change "downtown Big Rapids, north of campus." to "downtown Big Rapids, north of the campus."
   • add "(NHS)" after "National Highway System"
   • I am not sure that the Tridge is a formal name. If it is not, it should be in quotation marks.
   • change "This routing would be redesignated as US 10" to "This routing was redesignated as US 10"
   • change "[[U.S._Route_16_in_MIchigan" to "[[U.S. Route 16"

   B. MoS compliance:

   • "(NHS) ," - check for spaces in front of commas.

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

1. C. No original research:

2. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   It is very easy to miss any historically significant items. If you have researched the route, I will trust you that it is complete.

   B. Focused:

3. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

   Well done.

4. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

5. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

6. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

All of the suggested copy edits implemented. The proper name for the The Tridge is just that, so no change was made there. I appreciate any further suggestions you might have. Imzadi 1979 → 05:15, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

• Article previously stated, "Since the late 1960's, there was a proposal to relocate M-20 from south of Mecosta to South of Big Rapids, cutting through a lake development called Canadian Lakes. It is not known if this proposal is still active." We don't have to mention this if it is very dead, but have you check to see if there is any such redesignation pending? Racepacket (talk) 09:46, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
  • That statement came from a self-published source that I have been unable to verify independently. Imzadi 1979 → 10:07, 30 September 2010 (UTC)