Talk:Máel Dúin mac Áedo Alláin

Learn more about this page

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Ireland Low‑importance

	Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.

Biography: Royalty and Nobility

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Obit = obituary?

Latest comment: 16 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Not sure what the intention was, I don't understand this part: "at his obit in 789", what's an obit? Drunken Pirate (talk) 01:11, 4 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

obit: definition is obituary -reference:Webster's New World DictionaryTimelinefrog (talk) 01:17, 4 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

I doubt he had a published obituary in 768, so made phrase "at his death..." to be more clear Drunken Pirate (talk) 01:32, 4 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

The published obituary is in the Annals of Ulster under the year 788. It mentions this in the footnote in the article. Either way I don't really care because the article still makes sense either way. Seems too petty for me to really concern myself overTimelinefrog (talk) 01:35, 4 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Add topic