Talk:Luke Spencer

Merge

• Oppose Merge because this is a starting attempt at having different a different article for Luke. Before there was only the Luke and Laura article. Yes, it does copy a lot but most of Luke's story revolves around Laura. I think that as time moves on we can get a better article chronicling Luke's story alone.--Charleenmerced ^Talk 01:02, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

• Oppose Luke is a separate entity from Laura and should have his own profile.

MysticBlue 11:20, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

• Oppose As is stated above, Luke Spencer is an important character within daytime drama. In fact, he is what one would call a legend. Despite his life being significantly linked to Laura's, this article could be futher improved in the future to focus more on Luke himself. Flyer22 17:46, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

• Oppose. There should be individual character articles, plus the "Luke and Laura" page. --Elonka 11:47, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

• Oppose:I think that this article should stay seperate from the Luke/Laura article as well. There should also be a separate Laura article.

• Oppose I'm sure there must be storylines for Luke where Laura wasn't directly involved in, so where else would we put it? It's not good for the Luke and Laura supercouple page--only one half of the supercouple was in it! So definitely keep it separate from the supercouple page. --Miss Burkle 11:22, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

no!

Luke & Laura pgs SHOULD be seperate! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.230.113.157 (talk) 01:48, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

Stepson!?

I understand Luke and Laura had been married for a while, but they are divorced now, so should Nikolas be included as a stepson to Luke. Technically, he isn't even related to the man by marriage anymore. —Preceding unsigned comment added by AugustAugust (talk • contribs) 12:04, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Marriage Validity

Question, if Luke and Tracy's May 22, 2005 marriage is invalid, wouldn't that make Luke and Laura's 2007 remarriage valid??? I see someone keeps editing that Luke and Tracy are married invalidly, I'm going to change it to make the marriage legal (based on what Luke said was a lie). But if it does come out that Luke and Tracy's marriage is not legal, I hope it addresses the validity of Luke and Laura's remarriage. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.95.81.190 (talk) 03:01, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

Fake Luke

Wouldn't the marriage to Tracy be as invalid since the real Luke is not the one that is married to her?

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Luke Spencer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100815054029/http://www.tvguide.com/soaps/Backstage-Daytime-Emmys-10016.aspx to http://www.tvguide.com/soaps/Backstage-Daytime-Emmys-10016.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:00, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Luke Spencer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131029192057/http://sn.soapnet.go.com/news/article/night-shift-season-finale-preview to http://sn.soapnet.go.com/news/article/night-shift-season-finale-preview
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080917121341/http://abc.go.com/daytime/generalhospital/ to http://abc.go.com/daytime/generalhospital/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:53, 8 January 2018 (UTC)