Talk:Lucie Silvas
This page is not a forum for general discussion about Lucie Silvas. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Lucie Silvas at the Reference desk. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A year?
edit"Having been in the business for almost a year, Lucie has a UK tour, a platinum album and 4 top 40 singles already under her belt..."
Hasn't she been the business for at least six years seeing she recorded her first album in 2000?
"In 2003, Lucie was signed to Mercury Records, and given a long time to write her debut album, "Breathe In." " - Does "Forget Me Not" not count then? JP Godfrey 18:18, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
The game is won
editIn the Dutch article about Lucie Silvas there is something that some critics predicted that her third single The game is won would be number 1. Does anybody know if that is true? 83.128.5.95 18:42, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
- The dutch article sais: "Ondanks het feit dat verschillende Engelse critciti voorspelden dat dit nummer de eerste nummer 1-hit voor Lucie Silvas zou worden, kwam de single zeer teleurstellend niet hoger dan nr. 38 in de Britse charts" which means that they predicted it to be a #1 hit, but it didn't reach higher dan #38. So no, it's not true. Luigi-ish 19:38, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
I actually meant: is it true that the critics predicted this single to get to number 1. Because I know predictions can be way off, but there is a enormous difference between number 1 and number 38. I can't imagine them being so wrong. 83.128.6.80 16:32, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
Date of birth (moved from main page)
editThis DoB may be incorrect as her website states she is 29. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 81.178.6.22 (talk) 21:48, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
Geordan
editWhy do references to Geordan keep being removed? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.153.79.38 (talk) 19:45, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Lucie Silvas. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120608025058/http://www.thesaturdays.co.uk/news/on-your-radar-artwork-tracklisting-and-pre-orders-revealed/ to http://www.thesaturdays.co.uk/news/on-your-radar-artwork-tracklisting-and-pre-orders-revealed/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:34, 31 December 2017 (UTC)