Talk:Lucid (Aṣa album)/GA3

Latest comment: 13 days ago by Chchcheckit in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Versace1608 (talk · contribs) 20:14, 27 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: BlondArkhangel (talk · contribs) 06:24, 31 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

I plan to review this article, which talks about the album Lucid by Asa --BlondArkhangel (talk) 06:24, 31 October 2024 (UTC)BlondArkhangelReply

…are yall gonna review the article. Its been a month just saying // Chchcheckit (talk) 11:45, 11 December 2024 (UTC)Reply


GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
    a (reference section):   b (inline citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):   d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail: