This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism
This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States courts and judges, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States federal courts, courthouses, and United States federal judges on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States courts and judgesWikipedia:WikiProject United States courts and judgesTemplate:WikiProject United States courts and judgesUnited States courts and judges
Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I rolled back what I assume was a good faith edit by Iamreallygoodatcheckers that deleted 4.7 Tapping. This incident definitely was controversial, as it was covered by all the national television networks. Perhaps more could be said about the incident, which I would welcome. But I recommend against deleting the section entirely. Art SmartChart/Heart14:45, 28 June 2020 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
The section on COVID is mis-leading. Senator Gohmert put on his mask when entring the building. Democrat who was quoted later had to clarify what the said, as it was being used to imply Senator Gohmenrt was not wearing a mask. Outside he wasn't, but upon entering he did. While in the panel he was wearing a mask. Either remove the section on COVID or provide complete details to this section. 205.254.147.8 (talk) 17:51, 29 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Asking a question: Shouldn't the COVID-19 section be moved from Tenure to Controversies? Seems like it belongs in the latter location. Just my option. Thanks. Art SmartChart/Heart12:08, 30 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
His congressional office says "Louie" [1] As far as current usage goes, that should settle it. The usages of Louis in this article are: his full name, his birth name, and his father's name. Those all seem appropriate. -- MelanieN (talk) 19:54, 17 June 2021 (UTC)Reply
@Khronicle I -- Well, the article title uses Louie, and he is named "Louis" in the lead. (His father is mentioned as Louis.) The infobox uses both versions, whcih looks weird. The article (correctly) calls him "Gohmert" after the first naming, not Louis or Louie. 73.127.147.187 (talk) 18:06, 9 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 1 year ago7 comments2 people in discussion
@Magnolia677: In regards to your revert, I see no reason why The Tyler Loop wouldn't be considered reliable or significant, especially when the writer of the article, Eric Neugeboren, is also one of the reputable Texas Tribune. [2] Even then, I was still careful and chose to attribute the text due to the relative controversial nature of the text and Gohmert being a BLP. The other quote is a political scientist at a university. This is a reliable source that provides a good overall summary of a significant aspect of Gohmert's reputation. Iamreallygoodatcheckers talk19:37, 16 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
An editor could cherrypick from thousands of non-notable bloggers and podcasters to support any imaginable opinion. I could probably find a non-notable blogger who thinks Gohert should win the Nobel Prize. Just because someone says something on the internet, does not mean it is encyclopedic. Please see WP:VNOT, and remember this is a BLP. Magnolia677 (talk) 19:46, 16 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Magnolia677: I don't want step on any toes here and be accused of edit warring or something. Are you ok with me adding the content back with it sourced to the Texas Tribune? I was also thinking of removing the quote by the political scientist since it's kinda redundant to the other information. Iamreallygoodatcheckers talk20:37, 18 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
.jpg)
Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 19:49, 29 July 2020 (UTC)