Talk:Lockheed L-133
Latest comment: 1 month ago by Nimbus227 in topic Language reads auto-generated
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No photographs, diagrams or even proof this design ever existed.
editThat's it in a nutshell. The links at the bottom are gone, and there is no real evidence that any of this ever happened. Can we improve this article by including some citations and references, and maybe at least a drawing? I'm interested in learning more about this advanced plane the US military declined to fund. 73.6.96.168 (talk) 19:42, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
- Drawings and images are usually restricted by copyrights, and so its difficult to find copyright-free images for unbuilt projects. While the external links are dead, their are still two dead-tree books in the bibliography, and those are sufficient sources per Wikipedia's Reliable Sources policies. There are other books that cover the aircraft also. BilCat (talk) 19:50, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
Language reads auto-generated
editEspecially the swept-wing section, who writes like this? 2A02:8109:B709:D900:FDFB:987C:21F5:12E8 (talk) 15:56, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
- This edit added the scrambled text, it should have been noted earlier. Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by) 18:31, 30 October 2024 (UTC)