Talk:Live Undead/GA1

Latest comment: 13 years ago by CrowzRSA in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: SMasters (talk) 12:33, 5 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:  
    There were a number of grammar and puctuation issues, but I have fixed them all.
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:  
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:  
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
    Article is properly referenced.
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    B. Focused:  
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
    Article complies to WP:NPOV.
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
    Article is stable.
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
    Image checks out.
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  
    There were some minor issues which I have fixed. Everything checks out properly and I am confident that it meets all the requirements for a GA. As such, I am happy to pass it. Well done. – SMasters (talk) 12:58, 5 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
Thank you so much for your review, CrowzRSA 16:08, 6 March 2011 (UTC)Reply