Talk:List of radio stations in New York

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was move. —Nightstallion (?) 08:15, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

True or false: this article belongs at List of radio stations in New York. 66.245.8.61 00:20, 15 Sep 2004 (UTC)

(Description: the state article is at New York, not New York State (which is a re-direct.) 66.245.8.61 00:25, 15 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Requested move

The article on New York is at New York, not New York State. How does this article deserve the word "state" in its title?? Georgia guy 23:09, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

To distinguish it from a list of radio stations in New York City? Powers 00:10, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

Well, how is it logical for this article to have "New York State" in its title?? The article of the state itself is New York and that's the way articles relating to the state are expected to be titled. Georgia guy 00:49, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

All I'm saying is that "List of radio stations in New York" is ambiguous. The New York article even says, "It is sometimes called New York State when there is need to distinguish it from New York City..." In this case, it could be argued there is such a need. Powers 02:57, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

Well then, how is it logical that the main NY article is simply New York but this article gets titled with "New York State" in it?? Georgia guy 21:18, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

In that case, an article about the state, it's more important to have the name of the state correct. In this case, it's more important to be clear about whether we're referring to the state or the city. IMO. Powers 14:19, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

Why is what is important in the 2 cases inconsistent?? (And, why isn't anyone other than myself and Ltpowers putting anything in this proposed move??) Georgia guy 16:07, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

Makes sense to me, though I'm not quite sure whether the New York City / New York State ambiguity is resolved the best way it could be. —Nightstallion (?) 08:15, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

New listing

I created a new listing that is more town oriented based on a recent FCC query. The previous metropolitan approach wound up losing stations. I would strongly caution against adding additional detail about stations to the list as ownership/formats et al are often rapidly changing. There are now four lists and the details would soon conflict with each other. Add the ownership et al information to the station pages. BTW I do know there are some repeaters in this list. The best way to handle them is for redirects to the home station. Americasroof 22:05, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

List of Radio Stations in New York City

Why is there no list of radio stations ONLY in the New York City area? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.164.192.68 (talk) 23:04, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Convention has that lists are only built as far as the state level. On individual stations, you'll see navigation boxes that include all stations in a specific city, or market. Mlaffs (talk) 19:02, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

WELP

I don't understand why my addition keeps getting reverted. How can WELP be broadcasting without a license? Powers ^T 03:45, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

Sorry, @LtPowers:; I just saw this note now. Have a look at this article — gives a general overview of how the process works. It's likely that they're just testing the equipment to make sure that it's operating properly. Theoretically, there's also a chance they could be operating illegally, although let's hope not. Either way, from the FCC's perspective, they haven't advanced beyond the construction permit stage yet. In reality, there shouldn't actually even be an article for the station yet — convention has generally been that the station's not considered notable until it's licensed (another reason why it's not included in the various lists). Mlaffs (talk) 15:59, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for your response. Seems like a station would be notable if there's coverage of it, regardless of the status of the application. I assume the FCC's database your using is updated frequently? If so, I can only assume they're operating under a PTA. Unless the procedure for LP stations is different somehow... Powers ^T 01:27, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on List of radio stations in New York. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090825071957/http://www.fcc.gov/mb/audio/fmq.html to http://www.fcc.gov/mb/audio/fmq.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090825063614/http://www.fcc.gov/mb/audio/amq.html to http://www.fcc.gov/mb/audio/amq.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:05, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

"The whale fm" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect The whale fm has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 21 § The whale fm until a consensus is reached. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 22:43, 21 October 2023 (UTC)