This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This list has been altered a few different times now and still looked clunky. I went and looked through a few different publications (for example:Duel of the Ironcladsby Angus Konstam) and compiled this list based off them. The list arranges the categories by least versatile type of monitor to most versatile. Some publications list the Seagoing and Harbor monitors as separate types of monitors from the Coastal type and some publications combine the three under the Coastal heading. I personally like to have them separated; I think it makes better sense. For example, the Roanoke (Harbor) was never able to leave a harbor without extreme capsizing risk and the Miantonomoh (Seagoing) easily steamed across the Atlantic, something the Monitor (Coastal) likely would not have been able to do. Additionally, some text list the Milwaukee class monitors as river monitors. That was their initial, and intended, environment. But at least two of the four steamed in the Gulf of Mexico for extended periods of time justifying Coastal monitor status in many books and in the list I set up. If everybody likes it, we can just leave it alone, but if anybody has any suggestions feel free to air them. Zurel Darrillian14:36, 9 August 2006 (UTC)Reply