Talk:Liposarcoma

Just

Just a note that for diagnosis of liposarcomas, lipoblasts must be present... In case you want to add this to the article! :) - Natalie O'Halloran, med student. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.215.195.140 (talk) 12:38, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

"It is commonly believed that lipoblasts represent the hallmark of any liposarcoma subtype; however, it is important to emphasise that the mere presence of lipoblasts does not make (nor is required for) a diagnosis of liposarcoma" (Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of Soft Tissue and Bone, WHO, 2002) Bernhard138 (talk) 05:55, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

Although - survival rates

Although I also agree that the information is inaccurate published survival rates vary widely and the most serious liposarcomas do indeed have a poor survival rate. As a liposarcoma survivor I've absorbed as much info as possible and been annoyed at the conflicting reports so I'm not surprised to see that reflected here. rbanzai May 16, 2006

This info is incredibly inaccurate, especially the information on metastases and survival rates. There are several types of liposarcoma, and the most common types have incredibly high 5-year survival rates -- 90% plus. Even the most serious types of liposarcoma (mixed cell, undifferentiated) have a better survival rate than what is posted here. Metastases are also relatively uncommon with the more frequent forms of liposarcoma.

The site [1] seems to be the source of the <50% survival rate. RJFJR 20:45, September 3, 2005 (UTC)

suggesting template for Orthopaedic Conditions

I have been going through the list of orthopaedic conditions listed as stubs and suggesting this template for Orthopaedic Conditions (see Talk:Orthopedic surgery)
Name
Definition
Synonyms
Incidence
Pathogenesis
Pathology
Stages
Classification
Natural History/Untreated Prognosis
Clinical Features
Investigation
Non-Operative Treatment
Risks of Non-Operative Treatment
Prognosis following Non-Operative Treatment
Operative Treatment (Note that each operations should have its own wiki entry)
Risks of Operative Treatment
Prognosis Post Operation
Complications
Management
Prevention
History
--Mylesclough 05:49, 8 October 2005 (UTC)

External links

Wikipedia's external links policy and the specific guidelines for medicine-related articles do not permit the inclusion of external links to non-encyclopedic material, particularly including internet chat boards and e-mail discussion groups. Because I realize that most normal editors haven't spent much time with these policies, please let me provide specific information from the guidelines:

• This page, which applies to all articles in the entire encyclopedia, says that links "to social networking sites (such as MySpace or Fan sites), discussion forums/groups (such as Yahoo! Groups), USENET newsgroups or e-mail lists" are to be avoided.

• This page deprecates ""helpful" external links, such as forums, self-help groups and local charities."

• This medical-specific page reinforces the pan-Wiki rules, with a note that "All links must meet Wikipedia's external links guidelines, which in particular exclude discussion forums."

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and while it may occasionally be useful to patients or their families, it is not an advertising opportunity for support groups. Please do not re-insert links that do not conform to the standard rules. Any editor, BTW, is welcome to read all of the rules and perform an "audit" in the remaining links. Thanks, WhatamIdoing (talk) 21:52, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Draft:Liposarcoma Genome Project

There is an abandoned draft relating to this topic, if someone were able to review the material. Espresso Addict (talk) 23:27, 8 June 2018 (UTC)